Naver sources tracking
naversourcesAnonymous
The full Naver source set, tagged by corpus, tells you exactly how much of your category's answer is being served from Naver blog, cafe and knowledge-in versus the open Korean web.
How it renders
The complete reference set behind the answer, with corpus tagged per source.
Sampling
Source panels are wider and more stable than inline citations, so they reach a usable confidence interval at lower n.
Gotcha
Naver blog and cafe are one owner. Counting them as independent publishers overstates diversity and hides how closed the citation graph is.
What the API returns
A single collection call against Naver for the sources field, sampled n times and returned as one object per prompt.
{
"engine": "naver",
"field": "sources",
"prompt": "best ai visibility tracking tool",
"country": "GB",
"language": "en",
"n": 30,
"sources": [
{
"url": "https://nostimates.com/docs",
"domain": "nostimates.com",
"inline": true,
"sample_frequency": 0.7
},
{
"url": "https://example.org/report",
"domain": "example.org",
"inline": false,
"sample_frequency": 0.23
}
]
}Response fields
| Key | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| url | string | Source URL from the panel. |
| domain | string | Registrable domain. |
| title | string | null | Panel title as rendered. |
| inline | boolean | Whether this source was also cited inline. |
| sample_frequency | float | Share of n samples containing this source. |
What it costs
Included in the base collection wherever the engine exposes a panel.
See credit pricing →Naver sources FAQ
- How much comes from Naver's own corpora?
- The majority on most commercial categories. Corpus tagging makes the share explicit.
- What does that imply for strategy?
- Winning Naver is mostly about presence inside Naver's own properties, not about your website.
Quantify how closed Naver is for your category
We will run a sample and return the owned-corpus versus open-web split.
Across every engine
Compare how sources behaves on every engine we track.
Sources across all engines →